<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wake up, USPS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/2009/07/wake-up-usps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/2009/07/wake-up-usps/</link>
	<description>Confessions of a small business software developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:02:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zackary Geers</title>
		<link>http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/2009/07/wake-up-usps/comment-page-1/#comment-1951</link>
		<dc:creator>Zackary Geers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/?p=310#comment-1951</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m currently using stamps.com to do all of what you&#039;re having problems with.

We do automated APO shipments, it returns 6 images (most of that is the CP-72) in PNGs format that I print on 4 8.5x11 pages.  This covers APO, Puerto Rico &amp; Guam for us, along with light packages.  They also support outputting in ZPL, which works fine for our thermal label printers.  You can buy cheap zebra 450&#039;s from ebay, and buy a few spares, and they&#039;ll print labels in bulk at roughly 1 a second.  There are other output formats available, but that worked out perfectly for me.

My only problem is their server relibility has been a little off.  About 1% of the time I have problems with it, and it spits back an error about their servers being down.  If I make the same request a few seconds later, it magically works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m currently using stamps.com to do all of what you&#8217;re having problems with.</p>
<p>We do automated APO shipments, it returns 6 images (most of that is the CP-72) in PNGs format that I print on 4 8.5&#215;11 pages.  This covers APO, Puerto Rico &amp; Guam for us, along with light packages.  They also support outputting in ZPL, which works fine for our thermal label printers.  You can buy cheap zebra 450&#8242;s from ebay, and buy a few spares, and they&#8217;ll print labels in bulk at roughly 1 a second.  There are other output formats available, but that worked out perfectly for me.</p>
<p>My only problem is their server relibility has been a little off.  About 1% of the time I have problems with it, and it spits back an error about their servers being down.  If I make the same request a few seconds later, it magically works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Weber</title>
		<link>http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/2009/07/wake-up-usps/comment-page-1/#comment-1891</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 19:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/?p=310#comment-1891</guid>
		<description>&quot;We&#039;re the government. We don&#039;t have to give a shit if our services suck and our APIs don&#039;t work. Don&#039;t like it? Sit down and shut the fuck up!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re the government. We don&#8217;t have to give a shit if our services suck and our APIs don&#8217;t work. Don&#8217;t like it? Sit down and shut the fuck up!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/2009/07/wake-up-usps/comment-page-1/#comment-1848</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/?p=310#comment-1848</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re moving from Dazzle to Endicia Rate Server for our back-end shipping application, and looked into Stamps.com to compare. Turns out they don&#039;t charge per label, plus you can fund your account via credit card (and take advantage of rewards).

Haven&#039;t tested their API yet, though the documentation is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re moving from Dazzle to Endicia Rate Server for our back-end shipping application, and looked into Stamps.com to compare. Turns out they don&#8217;t charge per label, plus you can fund your account via credit card (and take advantage of rewards).</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t tested their API yet, though the documentation is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCL</title>
		<link>http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/2009/07/wake-up-usps/comment-page-1/#comment-1819</link>
		<dc:creator>MCL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 05:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/?p=310#comment-1819</guid>
		<description>Hi Nicholas,

Great post!  We deal with many of the same issues.  For our Dazzle integration, we built a client that constructs shipping xml and opens a shell to feed the xml into Dazzle.  The tricky part is the recording of  the response xml into our system.  Would love to use the Label Server, which should be a lot faster than our way, but as far as I know it&#039;s quite expensive.  You had mentioned that it&#039;s on par with the cost of Dazzle.  The most expensive version of Dazzle is $34.95 a month, and I don&#039;t think the Label Server is anywhere as low as that unless you have very low volume.

I am wondering however, how do you print the customs forms for International Priority / Express Mail with the Label Server?  Can you print to thermal printers, or do you still need to use regular paper and regular laser jet?

Also, I am curious as to why you use your payment processor to verify mailing addresses (I didn&#039;t even know that there are payment processors that can do that) if you are already using Fedex WebService to check for residential / business address.  Don&#039;t you already get the &#039;verified address&#039; returned from Fedex?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nicholas,</p>
<p>Great post!  We deal with many of the same issues.  For our Dazzle integration, we built a client that constructs shipping xml and opens a shell to feed the xml into Dazzle.  The tricky part is the recording of  the response xml into our system.  Would love to use the Label Server, which should be a lot faster than our way, but as far as I know it&#8217;s quite expensive.  You had mentioned that it&#8217;s on par with the cost of Dazzle.  The most expensive version of Dazzle is $34.95 a month, and I don&#8217;t think the Label Server is anywhere as low as that unless you have very low volume.</p>
<p>I am wondering however, how do you print the customs forms for International Priority / Express Mail with the Label Server?  Can you print to thermal printers, or do you still need to use regular paper and regular laser jet?</p>
<p>Also, I am curious as to why you use your payment processor to verify mailing addresses (I didn&#8217;t even know that there are payment processors that can do that) if you are already using Fedex WebService to check for residential / business address.  Don&#8217;t you already get the &#8216;verified address&#8217; returned from Fedex?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/2009/07/wake-up-usps/comment-page-1/#comment-1805</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 05:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/?p=310#comment-1805</guid>
		<description>Oh P.S., forgot to mention, add &quot;Pitney Bowes&quot; the &quot;Meter/scale&quot; maker to your list of racket members, for their Paypal integration, which produces postage paid labels.

I mean, USPS is a private corporation (cough cough), I guess they can sell to whomever they want right? And tell the rest of people to go buy it from them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh P.S., forgot to mention, add &#8220;Pitney Bowes&#8221; the &#8220;Meter/scale&#8221; maker to your list of racket members, for their Paypal integration, which produces postage paid labels.</p>
<p>I mean, USPS is a private corporation (cough cough), I guess they can sell to whomever they want right? And tell the rest of people to go buy it from them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/2009/07/wake-up-usps/comment-page-1/#comment-1804</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 05:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/?p=310#comment-1804</guid>
		<description>@Nicholas 

Thanks for the insightful work on this subject. You&#039;ve confirmed what I&#039;ve been nervously thinking. I&#039;m guessing Endicia or possibly Stamps.com is the only way to go. 

I had a nightmare last Christmas using their software with a printer that wouldn&#039;t print right and it took me until March to get the &quot;Balance&quot; of my account (which I had cancelled after the free trial) returned. Not to mention they put me on &quot;auto-dial&quot; for another 3 months after that with all sorts of great offers to come back...Gag. 

I had called USPS&#039;s API support (if you can call it that) and after explaining: I understood I wasn&#039;t going to be able &quot;pay&quot; for label using web tools, I asked how I would become an &quot;provider&quot; like Endicia or Stamps.com, he said he had no idea how that happened. 

Asking if he knew anyone to call or email with that sort of information he said: &quot;Nope&quot;. 

No wonder they loose $8,000,000,000 a year...

I like some of the ideas people have had about using their service (Web tools) combined with a little pulling and mashing of postage from another service like &quot;Click-and-Ship&quot;, I&#039;ll keep watching the conversation and report any new findings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nicholas </p>
<p>Thanks for the insightful work on this subject. You&#8217;ve confirmed what I&#8217;ve been nervously thinking. I&#8217;m guessing Endicia or possibly Stamps.com is the only way to go. </p>
<p>I had a nightmare last Christmas using their software with a printer that wouldn&#8217;t print right and it took me until March to get the &#8220;Balance&#8221; of my account (which I had cancelled after the free trial) returned. Not to mention they put me on &#8220;auto-dial&#8221; for another 3 months after that with all sorts of great offers to come back&#8230;Gag. </p>
<p>I had called USPS&#8217;s API support (if you can call it that) and after explaining: I understood I wasn&#8217;t going to be able &#8220;pay&#8221; for label using web tools, I asked how I would become an &#8220;provider&#8221; like Endicia or Stamps.com, he said he had no idea how that happened. </p>
<p>Asking if he knew anyone to call or email with that sort of information he said: &#8220;Nope&#8221;. </p>
<p>No wonder they loose $8,000,000,000 a year&#8230;</p>
<p>I like some of the ideas people have had about using their service (Web tools) combined with a little pulling and mashing of postage from another service like &#8220;Click-and-Ship&#8221;, I&#8217;ll keep watching the conversation and report any new findings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Piasecki</title>
		<link>http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/2009/07/wake-up-usps/comment-page-1/#comment-1525</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Piasecki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/?p=310#comment-1525</guid>
		<description>@Jeff

Yeah, the guy made it sound like manifest mailing was different from permit imprint, but they sure sounded the same to me, too. Give Endicia or Stamps (now that they have a Web-based API, though I haven&#039;t used it so I can&#039;t vouch for it) a call.

The Endicia API is a little strange in spots, particularly for international shipments, but that seems to more a result of the USPS than anything that Endicia has done wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeff</p>
<p>Yeah, the guy made it sound like manifest mailing was different from permit imprint, but they sure sounded the same to me, too. Give Endicia or Stamps (now that they have a Web-based API, though I haven&#8217;t used it so I can&#8217;t vouch for it) a call.</p>
<p>The Endicia API is a little strange in spots, particularly for international shipments, but that seems to more a result of the USPS than anything that Endicia has done wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/2009/07/wake-up-usps/comment-page-1/#comment-1523</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/?p=310#comment-1523</guid>
		<description>@Nicholas Piasecki
I looked into the manifest mailing aka permit imprint. Looks like you must have at least 200 identically weighted items or 50lbs to use this system. You are also required to keep a debit style account continually funded with the USPS. It also has a $185, one time fee... *sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nicholas Piasecki<br />
I looked into the manifest mailing aka permit imprint. Looks like you must have at least 200 identically weighted items or 50lbs to use this system. You are also required to keep a debit style account continually funded with the USPS. It also has a $185, one time fee&#8230; *sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Piasecki</title>
		<link>http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/2009/07/wake-up-usps/comment-page-1/#comment-1467</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Piasecki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/?p=310#comment-1467</guid>
		<description>@Jason

The PDK is the COM object referenced above. We used it for years and it is fine for low volume, but it tosses up UI and does not work for APO or FCMI.  I needed a solution that I could use without any user input.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jason</p>
<p>The PDK is the COM object referenced above. We used it for years and it is fine for low volume, but it tosses up UI and does not work for APO or FCMI.  I needed a solution that I could use without any user input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/2009/07/wake-up-usps/comment-page-1/#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/?p=310#comment-1466</guid>
		<description>Nicholas,

Thanks for the excellent info.  The Endicia solution is looking better now, especially since my client is already a customer.  I just hate having to involve a 3rd party like that when the direct connection to the USPS _almost_ works.

I just checked and apparently Stamps.com has an API available here:
http://www.stamps.com/pdk/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas,</p>
<p>Thanks for the excellent info.  The Endicia solution is looking better now, especially since my client is already a customer.  I just hate having to involve a 3rd party like that when the direct connection to the USPS _almost_ works.</p>
<p>I just checked and apparently Stamps.com has an API available here:<br />
<a href="http://www.stamps.com/pdk/">http://www.stamps.com/pdk/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

